Which individual would still be considered a juvenile based on commitment status?

In the context of juvenile justice, an individual's commitment status holds significant weight in determining their classification as a juvenile. A young person is typically considered a juvenile if they are under a specific age, which varies by jurisdiction but generally encompasses individuals up to 17 or 18 years old.

In the case of someone who is 20 years old and has been in commitment for three years, they are still recognized as a juvenile because they were adjudicated as such when they were a minor. Commitment often means that the individual is undergoing rehabilitation or treatment as part of a juvenile justice sentence, and their age at the time of offense dictates their status during that commitment. Thus, despite their age now being over the typical boundary for juvenile status, they are still classified as a juvenile for the duration of their commitment.

This reflects the understanding that the juvenile justice system emphasizes rehabilitation over punishment, and a commitment can extend the duration of juvenile status irrespective of the individual’s current age. In contrast, the other options feature individuals who have either aged out of the juvenile system or have not been committed, and thus would not retain juvenile status.